From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Philippe BEAUDOIN <phb(dot)emaj(at)free(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3 |
Date: | 2016-07-26 09:08:56 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT2iUGdW-DDwguicn8u3k4=VjjaH4UJQRchoHbfE6+B8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
I am not sure what's Stephen's status on this item, but I am planning
to look at it within the next 24 hours.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerome Wagner | 2016-07-26 09:20:35 | question on parsing postgres sql queries |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2016-07-26 07:50:37 | Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-07-26 11:37:16 | Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2016-07-26 08:54:54 | Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities? |