| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2017-11-29 02:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT-b8VTQEhJSNA380g66dgsYT-dAcH_mOqaPG9HCYp9uw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> It looks amazingly simple from here. Which probably means there's more to it
> that I haven't seen yet. I could use advice from someone who knows the
> locking subsystem better.
The status of this patch is I think not correct. It is marked as
waiting on author but Nikhil has showed up and has written an updated
patch. So I am moving it to next CF with "needs review".
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-11-29 02:21:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-29 02:16:49 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |