Re: On columnar storage (2)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: On columnar storage (2)
Date: 2015-12-22 13:30:22
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSxvyVjFZKiYgWxTRZCyxnmXmRucFbQcpmN4Rh4DiZ64Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Could we get this rebased past the merge of the parallel execution commits?

+1. Alvaro, Tomas, Simon, what are the next plans with those patches?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-22 13:36:25 Re: [Proposal] Table partition + join pushdown
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-22 13:19:49 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql