Re: RemoveIPC problem

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: scott ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RemoveIPC problem
Date: 2017-09-01 03:48:09
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSxovHqm-u8B=aTSaoF2Takd2mU=rtg1vfEiGC=TzBBUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, scott ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, I was kind of thinking that PG detects the semaphore not existing, bails immediately, restarts clean, thus no problem. I just wanted to hear from people, like you, that know way more than I do about the internals.

As long as you don't run Postgres on scissors with things like fsync =
off or full_page_writes = off, there should be no risk with the data
consistency.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott ribe 2017-09-01 03:49:30 Re: RemoveIPC problem
Previous Message scott ribe 2017-09-01 03:10:20 Re: RemoveIPC problem