From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Date: | 2017-01-24 04:45:38 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSxK+M7rr4yo-4bszT2AkVY0pKAvpJxReHTAotkBqMAKA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I agree that we could probably just go ahead and switch over to starting
> on the clog changes (there was agreement somewhere about the new name
> for that too), but, well, if I was someone watching all of this
> discussion, I have to admit I probably wouldn't be too excited starting
> on another set of name changes with all of this going on. Admittedly,
> the clog rename is a lot less user-facing and perhaps we should have
> started with it, but this is where we're at now.
There are no SQL-level functions and no binaries using the naming clog
or subtrans, so that's a good anti-complain start.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-01-24 04:48:29 | Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-01-24 04:39:58 | Re: Add pgstathashindex() to get hash index table statistics. |