From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Raphael Hertzog <hertzog(at)debian(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Fails to work on live images due to fsync() on pg_commit_ts before doing any write there |
Date: | 2017-11-07 14:18:04 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSwjeovBHqSUZXg3wfj8Yv8Z4=JDZ+iDyk96rQEAQvw-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Raphael Hertzog <hertzog(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> This has been explained by the overlayfs upstream developer
> (to which I reported this bug initially, thinking it was an
> overlayfs regression):
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-unionfs&m=151005246512873&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-unionfs&m=151005699414227&w=2
>
> My request is thus that PostgreSQL should fsync that directory only after
> it has made changes to the directory or its content. PostgreSQL 9.6 was
> working fine in the same setup and I would like PostgreSQL 10 to do the
> same. :)
>
> I'm ccing Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> because I believe that
> the problematic fsync() has been added by him in this commit:
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b02be21f271db6bd3cd43abb23fa596fcb6bac3
Hm. I am wondering if we should change fsync_fname_ext() so as EINVAL
is considered as a no-op. EIO and EINTR should really be caught with a
proper error, but I am not sure about this one. Thoughts?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-07 14:18:28 | Re: Fails to work on live images due to fsync() on pg_commit_ts before doing any write there |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-11-07 14:13:38 | Re: Fails to work on live images due to fsync() on pg_commit_ts before doing any write there |