| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Halsall <andyh(at)live(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq backwards compatbility |
| Date: | 2016-11-03 09:35:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSu+iqOqu-tgPrbAGSm+Lnkf+wpqVXDmQ5kCRYKakGAYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Andy Halsall <andyh(at)live(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> Can we assume that the 9.6 libpq library is backwards compatible with
> applications compiled against 9.3 headers? I wouldn't expect to have to
> re-compile our application against 9.6 libpq headers and redeploy because
> we're not taking advantage of any new features and nothing seems to have
> been deprecated.
>
> The release notes talk about additions to libpq in section E.2.3.9 "Client
> Interfaces". I'd expect any un-changed features to be backwards compatible.
> Limited testing suggests this is so but I can't find a clear statement.
>
> Could somebody please advise?
libpq has a long history of keeping a backward-compatible interface
across the ages, and that pays in the long term. Your application
compiled with 9.3 headers would link to libpq.so.5, so that would be
binary-compatible with 9.6. For consistency's sake, you may want to
recompile it anyway.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom DalPozzo | 2016-11-03 10:28:57 | WAL segmentes names in wrong order? |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Karasik | 2016-11-03 09:17:29 | replication setup: advice needed |