Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
Date: 2017-03-27 23:17:10
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSmoHHufEvFJQqA19fYAqi0jry+orTFTo4mjtFjDS29DA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thank you, pushed.

Thanks!

Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would
think so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it
before considering applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from
others?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2017-03-27 23:38:12 Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
Previous Message Alexey Kondratov 2017-03-27 22:54:54 Re: GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY execution with errors handling