Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com
Cc: Юрий Соколов <funny(dot)falcon(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA
Date: 2017-12-01 05:25:19
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSm21sdwCAuWXnFLVERQjy6CMC4zqYMyHc2BJo63ZZJng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 07:41 AM, Юрий Соколов wrote:
>> Oh... there were stupid error in previos file.
>> Attached fixed version.
>
> I can reconfirm my performance findings with this patch; system same as
> up-thread.

I have moved this patch to next CF, with "needs review" as status as a
new patch has been sent after addressing Andres' comments.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-01 05:27:09 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]make pg_rewind to not copy useless WAL files
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-01 05:21:09 Re: [HACKERS] Constraint exclusion for partitioned tables