Re: pg_regress writes into source tree

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress writes into source tree
Date: 2015-04-08 02:02:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSkezQwDSOhLo-b+6EOP=yMJxs0ZPaTAu+a5K2cynmyrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Just so this doesn't get lost... did something make it into a CommitFest on
> this?

Peter's patch has been committed as 64cdbbc, while the idea to create
sql/ by pg_regress if it is not present did not gather much interest
in this CF:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/4/100/
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2015-04-08 02:16:43 Re: Tuple visibility within a single XID
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2015-04-08 01:57:50 Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );