From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Better support of exported snapshots with pg_dump |
Date: | 2014-10-28 02:15:43 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSjOEieh4hBTJ_QeUtdGDqnnEGXVEiVJ_xi6k95qV2xig@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I have two minor things:
> + printf(_(" --snapshot use given synchronous
> snapshot for the dump\n"));
Thanks for your input!
> I think this should say --snapshot=NAME or something like that to make it
> visible that you are supposed to provide the parameter.
Right. Let's do --snapshot=SNAPSHOT then.
> The other thing is, you changed logic of the parallel dump behavior a little
> - before your patch it works in a way that one connection exports snapshot
> and others do "SET TRANSACTION SNAPSHOT", after your patch, even the
> connection that exported the snapshot does the "SET TRANSACTION SNAPSHOT"
> which is unnecessary. I don't see it as too big deal but I don't see the
> need to change that behavior either.
Indeed, let's save some resources and not have the connection
exporting the snapshot use SET TRANSACTION SNAPSHOT if that's not
necessary.
> You could do something like this instead maybe?:
> if (AH->sync_snapshot_id)
> SET TRANSACTION SNAPSHOT
> else if (AH->numWorkers > 1 && AH->remoteVersion >= 90200 &&
> !dopt->no_synchronized_snapshots)
> AH->sync_snapshot_id = get_synchronized_snapshot(AH);
> And remove the else if for the if (dumpsnapshot) part.
Right as well. We still need to check for dumpsnapshot to set up
sync_snapshot_id for the first connection such as it can pass the
value to the other workers though.
Updated patch with those comments addressed is attached.
Regards,
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
20141028_pg_dump_snapshot_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 6.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip kumar | 2014-10-28 03:33:50 | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-28 01:44:18 | Re: Reducing the cost of sinval messaging |