Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date: 2013-11-15 15:05:09
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSjFcudQbL+wZGY9xa-bHHOe2AqfuPb9Awsjt-3HZ+6ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> those are functions that are no longer used but Josh considered they
> could become useful before release.
> i can put them inside #ifdef _NOT_USED_ decorations or just remove
> them now and if/when we find some use for them re add them
Why not simply removing them? They will be kept in the git history either way.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-11-15 15:09:27 Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-11-15 15:04:12 Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy