| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit queryId? |
| Date: | 2017-10-04 14:11:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSbZN-o=kNCZy2LKUyiYzGPFHF7Jr7TVpFce7APd7smCg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Not really; dynahash won't merge two keys just because their hash
> codes come out the same. But you're right; that's probably not the
> best way to do it. TBH, why do we even have pgss_hash_fn? It seems
> like using tag_hash would be superior.
Yes, using tag_hash would be just better than any custom formula.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2017-10-04 14:23:20 | Re: datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-04 14:05:47 | Re: datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries |