From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Production block comparison facility |
Date: | 2014-07-31 08:02:57 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSazOSnSbcE5fqjF=WFS_pEuZbno9drPdqS1sEFf9j_ww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeh, it looks like you need to do CheckBackupBlock() exactly as many
> times as you do RestoreBackupBlock(), with the sequence of actions
> being RestoreBackupBlock(), apply WAL then CheckBackupBlock(). That
> will work without much code churn, it will be just a one line addition
> in a few dozen places.
Additionally, as this is a recovery-only feature, I was thinking that
it would be better to control it with a parameter of recovery.conf.
Let's call it check_full_page_writes for example. Thoughts?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2014-07-31 08:06:46 | Re: commitfest status |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-07-31 07:07:52 | Re: Production block comparison facility |