Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Date: 2016-05-05 23:49:34
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSaoyDsMgDX6rsFMNLDLJ_r+VBppU7GLXw0k_eDz87sWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2016-05-05 16:25:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> This was basically an attempt to cure a defect in 48354581a and could
>>> perhaps be lumped under that item.
>
>> It's also an independent performance improvement (sadly), and has the
>> potential for issues; so there's *some* benefits on keeping this as its
>> own entry.
>
> I left that as-is, but otherwise adopted Robert's suggestions.
> Thanks for the comments!

Are you not adding VS2015 support in those notes? Petr Jelinek is a
co-author btw, he's missing from the credits in 0fb54de.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-06 00:15:05 Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Previous Message David Rowley 2016-05-05 23:37:18 Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates)