Re: wal_retrieve_retry_interval

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ludovic Vaugeois-Pepin <ludovicvp(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wal_retrieve_retry_interval
Date: 2017-05-28 04:54:10
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSYL=w8Lmtntdj5uxgUFW_Y10KduHrrHS+bERS-YvyYmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ludovic Vaugeois-Pepin
<ludovicvp(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Say, with 9.6.2, a hot_standby fails to connect to a replication slot:
> FATAL: could not start WAL streaming: ERROR: replication slot "test3"
> does not exist
> or
> FATAL: could not connect to the primary server: FATAL: the database
> system is starting up
>
> Is there a way to reduce the time it takes until the next attempt? I
> assumed, wrongly I think, that this would be wal_retrieve_retry_interval,
> but it seems that it won't make a difference. I tried setting it to 3s, but
> it seems to take 15s still. Here are two log samples:

Could you double-check your configuration? If I set
wal_retrieve_retry_interval to 1s on a standby, I am able to see a
connection attempt from a WAL receiver happening with this interval of
time in the case of repetitive failures.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludovic Vaugeois-Pepin 2017-05-28 08:07:05 Fwd: wal_retrieve_retry_interval
Previous Message doganmeh 2017-05-27 22:29:41 Re: COPY: row is too big