Re: 10.0

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-15 12:02:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSUBCa1Mp-AcYzo89JGEGPFYpedwXssApsOpkvMYhKnSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
>> I think moving to a two-number format is a mistake: what exactly will
>> PQserverVersion() return in that case?
>
> For, say, 10.2 it would be 100002, equivalent to 10.0.2 under old style.
>
> We could redefine it as being major plus four-digit minor, really.
> Under the current maintenance scheme we never get anywhere near minor
> release 99 before a branch dies ... but having some more breathing room
> there would not be a bad thing.

Perhaps that would be a good topic for the developer meeting in
Ottawa? That's just in two days, so it looks like a good timing.
--
Michael

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-15 02:59:55 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Hernández Tortosa 2016-05-15 12:29:45 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-05-15 06:34:58 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Windows service is not starting so there’s message in log: FATAL: "could not create shared memory segment “Global/PostgreSQL.851401618”: Permission denied”