| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Hanák <hanak(at)is-it(dot)eu>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with "pg.dropped" column after upgrade 9.5 to 9.6 |
| Date: | 2016-11-02 06:54:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSTExy8rf_j7pQN5Zn-SCvFFNA48OKGREyHvNzebpxNew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2016-11-01 22:56 GMT+01:00 Pavel Hanák <hanak(at)is-it(dot)eu>:
>> Can anybody explain what is the problem?
>
> please, can you send test case - I cannot to reproduce this bug on master.
I can reproduce the regression on master and 9.6:
DROP TABLE aa;
CREATE TABLE aa (a int, b int, c int);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION _test_sql_update(in do_update boolean)
RETURNS VOID LANGUAGE sql VOLATILE AS $$
update aa
set a = NULL
where do_update;
$$;
INSERT INTO aa VALUES (generate_series(1,1,1));
INSERT INTO aa VALUES (generate_series(2,1,1));
INSERT INTO aa VALUES (generate_series(3,1,1));
ALTER TABLE aa DROP COLUMN b;
SELECT _test_sql_update(false);
SELECT _test_sql_update(true);
I am just digging into it... An interesting part is that removing the
WHERE clause makes the regression go away.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-11-02 07:46:46 | Re: Problems with "pg.dropped" column after upgrade 9.5 to 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-11-02 06:32:02 | Re: Problems with "pg.dropped" column after upgrade 9.5 to 9.6 |