From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Date: | 2015-07-07 04:56:36 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSSxX9hARyDKA0OQ4LhKrdW69dqcpLi84o0pguiVj2VMQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 07/06/2015 06:40 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> pro-JSON:
>>>
>>> * standard syntax which is recognizable to sysadmins and devops.
>>> * can use JSON/JSONB functions with ALTER SYSTEM SET to easily make
>>> additions/deletions from the synch rep config.
>>> * can add group labels (see below)
>>
>> If we go this way, I think that managing a JSON blob with a GUC
>> parameter is crazy, this is way longer in character size than a simple
>> formula because of the key names. Hence, this JSON blob should be in a
>> separate place than postgresql.conf not within the catalog tables,
>> manageable using an SQL interface, and reloaded in backends using
>> SIGHUP.
>
> I'm not following this at all. What are you saying here?
A JSON string is longer in terms of number of characters than a
formula because it contains key names, and those key names are usually
repeated several times, making it harder to read in a configuration
file. So what I am saying that that we do not save it as a GUC, but as
a separate metadata that can be accessed with a set of SQL functions
to manipulate it.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-07-07 05:19:28 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2015-07-07 04:49:58 | Re: Memory Accounting v11 |