From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE |
Date: | 2015-11-12 12:35:57 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSOsgit3+cenj1dCeWOK-RAHrw6eA=XJuKoG0_+TyxXew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:43 PM, dinesh kumar wrote:
> We can also use "PROGRAM 'cat > Output.csv' " to achieve this "NO READ
> ACCESS", since the program is always running as a instance owner.
> Let me know your inputs and thoughts.
That's one way. And as PROGRAM presents the advantage to open the file
before the COPY has begun processing any tuples, the umask would be
set before writing any data to it, hence why complicating COPY with a
new option while we already have something to apply restrictions to
the output file? It seems that this patch is just an unnecessary
complication, and I doubt that we would want to change the default
behavior of 644 that has been here for ages.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2015-11-12 12:37:26 | LLVM miscompiles numeric.c access to short numeric var headers |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-11-12 12:16:16 | Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data |