Re: creating extension including dependencies

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Attached patch uses just boolean in cascade DefElem and splits the
>> CreateExtension into two functions, the cascade code now calls the
>> CreateExtensionInternal. One thing though - I am passing the DefElems
>> directly to the cascaded CreateExtensionStmt options, I think it's not
>> problem but want to give it extra visibility.
>>
>> Also the schema check was moved.
>
> OK, passing the list of extensions through the new routine is indeed a
> cleaner approach. One point of detail is that instead of doing this
> part:
> + /* Handle the CASCADE option. */
> + if (d_cascade)
> + cascade = defGetBoolean(d_cascade);
> + else
> + cascade = false;
> You may as well just initialize cascade to false at the beginning of
> the routine and update it only if d_cascade is defined.
>
> Attached are as well changes for the documentation that I spotted in
> earlier reviews but were not included in the last version sent by Petr
> yesterday. Feel free to discard them if you think they are not
> adapted, the patch attached applies on top of Petr's patch.

And /log/ is missing in src/test/modules/extensions/.gitignore.
--
Michael