| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: session server side variables |
| Date: | 2017-02-03 06:23:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSKyxx1KPsOX4gGKkm+8Y7HohHgVTD-eHJJ51b4Sdhf6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> My patch was marked as "returned with feedback". Personally, I had not a
> idea what can be next step and what is preferred design, if some preferred
> design exists. I don't know what I have to change on my proposal.
Perhaps this was not adapted, sorry about that. Now the latest patch
is 2-month old and does not apply. If you think that the approach you
are taking is worth it, you can of course submit again a new version
and make the discussion move on. Finding a consensus is the difficult
part though.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-02-03 06:25:45 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-02-03 06:16:44 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |