From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | deepak <deepak(dot)pn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to exclude building/installing contrib modules on Windows |
Date: | 2015-01-11 08:48:49 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSKyBqz73XUFGBPWdP=L3BzGdp4Rm8xycmh36sDg85BWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:36 AM, deepak <deepak(dot)pn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, I'm using a customized fork of 9.1.9.
> Ok, adding back spi and dummy_seclabel makes all regression tests pass.
Please do not top-post, this makes the thread lose readability.
> I now have one concern though. Inspite of adding pgcrypto to the
> exclude list, it still ends up being built and installed. Any way to avoid
> this?
pgcrypto requires quite a bit of hacking to be compiled correctly, so
it is defined as an independent project, have a look at that in
Mkvcbuild.pm:
# Pgcrypto makefile too complex to parse....
my $pgcrypto = $solution->AddProject('pgcrypto','dll','crypto');
[blah]
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-11 08:53:48 | Re: unexpected PQresultStatus: 8 with simple logical replication |
Previous Message | tuanhoanganh | 2015-01-11 05:18:24 | Re: Does anyone user pg-pool II on real production ? Please help me. |