Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)
Date: 2016-03-12 10:19:44
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSJz9hahtAb8TgEZs7f+juhfCJtt_7SxPK4vEncuUWxFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> IMO this is not committable as-is, and I don't think that it's something
> that will become committable during this 'fest. I think we'd be well
> advised to boot it to the 2016-09 CF and focus our efforts on other stuff
> that has a better chance of getting finished this month.

Yeah, I would believe that a good first step would be to discuss
deeply about that directly at PGCon for folks that will be there and
interested in the subject. It seems like a good timing to brainstorm
things F2F at the developer unconference for example, a couple of
months before the 1st CF of 9.7. We may perhaps (or not) get to
cleaner picture of what kind of things are wanted in this area.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-12 10:27:56 Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-12 09:08:51 Re: Background Processes and reporting