From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |
Date: | 2014-11-15 05:34:13 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSB=M-=_GmZR_J5hv1X0m1VwibnrSJWC9zJS5+gSLD57A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 3) pg_xlogdump does not seem to work:
> $ pg_xlogdump 00000001000000000000000D
> pg_xlogdump: FATAL: could not find a valid record after 0/D000000
This one is a bad manipulation from my side. Please forget this comment.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-11-15 05:52:00 | Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-11-15 05:12:55 | Re: New storage parameter pages_per_range not mentioned in CREATE INDEX doc |