Re: Mail thread references in commits

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Mail thread references in commits
Date: 2016-11-19 02:20:16
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS6uOc6D-Pzo7mQDbA0YjWBZS1V98scrHDOhTaV-C80cg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I do ask of that offline or at least locally. So I won't use something that makes that uncomfortable.

No committer here. But I do search for mails using the discussion ID
present in the log message by querying in my local mail box copy on a
more or less daily basis. So having a hash will clearly reduce the
flexibility of how things are possible today.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas Doole 2016-11-19 02:59:34 Re: possible optimizations - pushing filter before aggregation
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-11-19 02:09:53 Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Keep indexes sorted by heap physical location