From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
Date: | 2016-11-19 02:20:16 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS6uOc6D-Pzo7mQDbA0YjWBZS1V98scrHDOhTaV-C80cg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I do ask of that offline or at least locally. So I won't use something that makes that uncomfortable.
No committer here. But I do search for mails using the discussion ID
present in the log message by querying in my local mail box copy on a
more or less daily basis. So having a hash will clearly reduce the
flexibility of how things are possible today.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Douglas Doole | 2016-11-19 02:59:34 | Re: possible optimizations - pushing filter before aggregation |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-11-19 02:09:53 | Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Keep indexes sorted by heap physical location |