From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hash index creation warning |
Date: | 2015-06-24 07:06:19 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS6Z6SP8aTHNDbEOPpiRTvni2HiX-UqPOfXaDhXf982Sg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think you should be testing RelationNeedsWAL(), not the
> relpersistence directly. The same point applies for temporary
> indexes.
Indeed. Patch updated attached.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
20150624_hash_index_unlogged_v2.patch | application/x-patch | 2.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-06-24 08:43:43 | Re: pg_stat_*_columns? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-06-24 06:43:35 | Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server |