Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2016-10-06 23:09:44
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS5967co0TMTFN-+C28JqYQpa=ZfhhZvdCAen8okT8UOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Your customer
> databases might feature far more use of Japanese collations, for
> example, which might be an important factor.

Not really :)
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-06 23:50:40 Re: pgbench vs. wait events
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-10-06 23:05:09 Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)