Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Date: 2017-11-30 03:44:16
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS4bhSsDm_47GVjQno=iU6thx13MQVwwXXKBHQwfwwNCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> # I had been forgetting to count the version for latestst several
> # patches. I give the version '4' - as the next of the last
> # numbered patch.

With all the changes that have happened in the documentation lately, I
suspect that this is going to need a rework.. Moved to next CF per
lack of reviews, with waiting on author as status.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:48:57 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:41:42 Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication