Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Date: 2017-11-28 01:48:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS4VSUiaFnGmR2k95-RtEi++SEwZk32pMu_31VLyMpK0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. I agree your patch is more consistent and
> generally cleaner.

This is classified as a bug fix, and is marked as waiting on author. I
am moving it to next CF as work continues.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-28 01:55:34 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-28 01:46:06 Re: [HACKERS] subscription worker signalling wal writer too much