Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes that would be indeed cleaner this way. I have poked a bit at that
>> and finished with the attached that defines some rules to generate all
>> the files needed.
>
> I made some mostly-cosmetic changes to this and pushed it. One thing
> to note is that it seemed to me you'd broken the rule for schemapg.h:
> by removing the phony target, I think you removed the behavior that
> we'd always go and recheck schemapg.h's dependencies. To do it correctly
> without that target, we'd need src/backend/Makefile to know all of those
> dependencies, duplicating the rather long list in catalog/Makefile.

Thanks. Yes the bug that I was mentioning yesterday was that I missed
one place where the target of schemapg.h was referenced, and I didn't
take the time to fully cover this set of dependencies..
--
Michael