From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |
Date: | 2016-06-30 13:12:33 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS1qBykZ2UoHm==ftM4UGXAJpkBRd4oTSkyqGO=p-MPSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> >> ISTM that we will never be able to get out of this loop if walreceiver
>> >> fails to connect to the master (e.g., password is wrong) after we enter
>> >> this loop.
>> >
>> > Wouldn't it be cleaner to just return an error here instead of retrying?
>>
>> I prefer to return NULL. Now NULL is returned when walreceiver's pid is 0.
>> We can just change this logic so that NULL is returned pid is 0 OR the
>> flag is false.
>
> For the conninfo only, or for everything?
All of them. If this connstr is not ready for display, the WAL
receiver does not have a proper connection yet, so there is nothing
worth showing anyway to the user.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-06-30 13:15:20 | pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-06-30 12:41:48 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |