| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-10-02 13:55:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS-rb9t56auqj+7YnLNO+U0QxSA9jvW8x-eXS_CGG4yBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
>> On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
>>> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output
>>> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
>>> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking
>>> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
>>>
>>> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
>>> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.
>
>> I agree with everything Alvaro just said.
>
> Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that? People
> did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but
> maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing.
>
> Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...
Let's remove it and move on then. By looking again at this thread and
particularly https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160926190618.GH5148@tamriel.snowman.net
(thanks Stephen for the summary) that's where we are heading to.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-02 13:56:33 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-02 13:50:44 | Re: pg_upgade vs config |