Re: replication slots replicated to standbys?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication slots replicated to standbys?
Date: 2016-08-22 02:49:02
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS-VocFVv=YwW18M8_3vpFm4VY-9smOm_hQr+sTG1oyRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Note as well that pg_basebackup omits its content and creates an empty
>> directory.
>
> Are there any other error-prone things copied from the master?

The contents of pg_snapshots get copied by pg_basebackup. Those are
useless in a backup, but harmless.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-08-22 03:13:31 Logical decoding of sequence advances, part II
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-08-22 02:40:44 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?