Re: TAP backpatching policy

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TAP backpatching policy
Date: 2017-05-31 01:45:39
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS=gf5ddueAqf6ZwLhkRht2zCR885d8Tn0mcHqVNKTi4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thoughts? Backpatch new TAP methods, etc, into back branches routinely?

FWIW, I'd love to see a committer helping into getting this facility
back-patched at least to 9.5. The least I can do is a commitment as a
reviewer of such a patch. So count me in to help out.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Hernández Tortosa 2017-05-31 01:50:26 Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-31 01:39:52 Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256