Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2017-11-30 01:59:12
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS+2ZRcZZGMJOAYON2h_GOL8G2QhjmbZT__pPuZ8feA0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik
<k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> One more patch passing all regression tests with autoprepare_threshold=1.
> I still do not think that it should be switch on by default...

This patch does not apply, and did not get any reviews. So I am moving
it to next CF with waiting on author as status. Please provide a
rebased version. Tsunakawa-san, you are listed as a reviewer of this
patch. If you are not planning to look at it anymore, you may want to
remove your name from the related CF entry
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/16/1150/.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 02:02:06 Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 01:54:53 Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause