| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rudy Barbieri <barbiomalefico(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: followed by example doesn't work |
| Date: | 2017-12-04 22:51:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS++-ywwTdkqLABTRh-go-pRDX8CqRp=oEks7xCazL4_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Rudy Barbieri <barbiomalefico(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> But it could be better improve the documentation highlighting that in
>> previous versions there was a bug.
>
> I see no bug here ... failing to recognize an operator that was added in
> later versions can hardly be classed as a bug.
If you wish to have a given operator supported in a past version of
Postgres, you could have it done in the shape of an extension as well.
There are many people and companies able to do so if you cannot.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vladqt | 2017-12-05 11:43:13 | Binary format for array in COPY-command |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-04 14:48:08 | Re: followed by example doesn't work |