Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II
Date: 2017-07-15 07:46:25
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRzJVrm3dVu-xmKVgrP6wmSvkgMqAmDcxW8ni+GmSx-xw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> While this might be possible by having some kind of special trusted
> connection between the pooler and PG, I actually don't particularly like
> the notion of inventing a bunch of complicated logic and pain so that a
> connection pooler can avoid implementing a proper authentication system.

I strongly agree with that.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-07-15 08:25:43 Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Previous Message Noah Misch 2017-07-15 05:18:27 Re: More race conditions in logical replication