| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE |
| Date: | 2015-09-04 01:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRyEmtjehrpZFY4ZdkT-ud0G4r1AFg+cWwsnZvfuhHHYg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>wrote:
> On reflection I think that the tracking of activeSubid in my patch is
> probably overkill if we're attacking it this way. We can just have
> AtSubAbort_Portals fail any ACTIVE portal regardless of subxact level,
> which is pretty analogous to what AtAbort_Portals has done for a long
> time.
>
Tracking the activated subxact looked neat from my side, that's more
consistent with what is done when the portal is marked as ready,
particularly with the new routine introduced.
> Let me work on this and see if I can get to a simpler patch.
>
Oh, OK. Thanks!
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-09-04 01:15:07 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-09-04 01:10:51 | Re: BRIN INDEX value |