From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |
Date: | 2016-03-22 13:40:32 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRxVTmHdh2Hg3BypH+-fK3xXA7t4MB2WRu7J=6oW9JwFA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Something like attached is simplest way this would work correctly (note that
> I didn't really test it and it's missing comments). Note that we are falling
> back to the old parsing in case the GetLocaleInfoEx didn't work, that's
> important because GetLocaleInfoEx does not support the
> <Language>_<Country>.<CodePage> format but supports all the rest of them.
> The problem with this is the binaries would need to be compiled with target
> of vista/windows server 2008+. That would be of course only the case with
> builds made with VS2015, so I am not sure if we care all that much
> (especially given the fact that older windows are not supported by MS
> anyway).
Ah, OK. Of course.
> I don't currently know of any way of doing this in VS2015 that would work
> with older versions of windows with the exception of having our own
> definition of the locale_t struct so that the VS2013 code would still
> work...
There is no actual way to be sure if this is an intentional change or
not, if we see it back in the next version of VS, why not... I would
like to think like you that this is actually a merge mistake from
Redmond-side, but I think we had better be careful here, this could
lead to undetected errors in the future.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-22 13:44:23 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2016-03-22 13:37:46 | Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql |