Re: WAL replay bugs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL replay bugs
Date: 2014-07-19 01:42:43
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRrsgyUeROrCU+Uk=N63rCELEOzWbZ9-y6L9k5x9RVgAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Although I doubt necessity of the flexibility seeing the current
> testing framework, I don't have so strong objection about
> that. Nevertheless, perhaps you are appreciated to put a notice
> on.. README or somewhere.
Hm, well... Fine, I added it in this updated series.

Regards,
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Move-SEQ_MAGIC-and-sequence-page-opaque-data-to-sequ.patch text/plain 4.0 KB
0002-Extract-generic-bash-initialization-process-from-pg_.patch text/plain 4.7 KB
0003-Buffer-capture-facility-check-WAL-replay-consistency.patch text/plain 42.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2014-07-19 02:31:53 subquery in CHECK constraint
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-07-19 00:50:14 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)