Re: Bogus cleanup code in PostgresNode.pm

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus cleanup code in PostgresNode.pm
Date: 2016-04-27 06:17:19
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRp0bpKtmWjDvBGXRVbmdR5+Bxhky+zXCA8tqwoh-9LUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Now, whether using END is really an improvement is a separate question.
> I have the impression that END calls happen in a better-defined order,
> but I'm not a perl monk.

For the archive's sake, 08af9219 is the result commit.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-27 06:42:09 Re: Parallel build with MSVC
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-27 05:37:43 Re: Removing faulty hyperLogLog merge function