From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ignoring some binaries generated in src/test |
Date: | 2015-04-25 14:51:40 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRkXigX8fkALzsGVikZJHrBOT2_o33=aDC50NosmNOSBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The current logic in src/test/Makefile, particularly the way that
>>> the modules subdirectory is handled, seems pretty ugly/convoluted
>>> anyway. I wonder why it was done that way rather than just ensuring
>>> that modules/ doesn't do anything for "make install"?
>
>> Because we do want to have the Makefile in src/test/modules to install
>> the modules if "make install" is invoked there. That way, you can run
>> "make -C src/test/modules install installcheck", and it works.
>
> OK. I still wonder if there isn't a better way to get that effect, but
> I left it alone for now. I committed Michael's new .gitignore files and
> fixed the Makefiles so that "make clean" and friends clean up properly.
Thanks.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-04-25 14:53:36 | Re: forward vs backward slashes in msvc build code |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-04-25 14:36:07 | Re: collate.linux.utf8 test coverage |