On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> 2016-06-15 5:00 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Martin wrote:
>>> I wonder if this is the desirable way of handling pgq, or if those
>>> tables should be dumped. I'm starting to think that this is a PgQ bug,
>>> or maybe it's not a good idea to install PgQ as an extension.
>>
>> As I am looking at that I would qualify that as a bug in pg_dump.
>> Schemas can be part of the extension definition and be linked to it,
>> and tables created on top of the schema defined in the extension
>> should really be dumped..
>
> How would the recovery process work? We expect the schema to be there
> when restoring the tables?
pg_dump creates the schema first via the CREATE EXTENSION command,
then tables dependent on this schema that are not created by the
extension are dumped individually.
--
Michael