Re: Synch failover WAS: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Synch failover WAS: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-07-04 01:16:58
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRjMqRzj6jBZDa+PJSQE=TBR3WunRsW_FFq5Gk_Gn4+gA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> This subthread is getting absurd, stopping here.

Yeah, I agree with Andres here, we are making a mountain of nothing
(Frenglish?). I'll send to the other thread some additional ideas soon
using a JSON structure.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan de Visser 2015-07-04 01:24:36 Re: Idea: closing the loop for "pg_ctl reload"
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-07-04 00:36:36 Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior