Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Emanuel Calvo <emanuel(dot)calvo(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
Date: 2014-03-22 01:15:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRhXxFxRwXdSqpgxbzB2_0s=xDSbes1-o+p4dP8KNYw0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
<emanuel(dot)calvo(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
> output for the "events" parameter.
>
> But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
>
> { INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
>
> or
>
> INSERT
> UPDATE
> DELETE
> SELECT
> - --
>
>
> I attach a patch for each one.
>
> I sent a mail to pgsql-docs but no response has been received.
The list of events possible is already listed in the section
"Parameters" => "event":
Page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createrule.html
Quote: "The event is one of SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE."
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2014-03-22 02:18:45 Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
Previous Message Emanuel Calvo 2014-03-21 15:56:01 Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2014-03-22 01:15:43 Re: Partial index locks
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2014-03-22 01:13:16 Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence