| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wal_segment size vs max_wal_size |
| Date: | 2016-09-27 00:38:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRgvyzaQONBsfn8EBedJMQmwmdHMeR9JwTkmPCnz_ki6g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> IIRC, there is already a patch to update the minRecoveryPoint
>> correctly, can you check if that solves the problem for you?
>>
>> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160609.215558.118976703.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp
>>
> +1. I've tested after applying the patch. This clearly solves the problem.
Even if many things have been discussed on this thread,
Horiguchi-san's first patch is still the best approach found after
several lookups and attempts when messing with the recovery code.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-27 00:45:41 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_ctl: Detect current standby state from pg_control |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-27 00:30:02 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |