From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config |
Date: | 2015-07-02 23:52:14 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRfZjNOmJxHmx8UcvYsWf4cKG-N1hEdwGiGm4D9QgswBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ... So attached is a patch that adds VERSION_NUM in
>> Makefile.global.
>
> While there was not exactly universal consensus that we need this, the
> patch as given is merely two lines, so it seems awfully cheap to Just
> Do It. Hence, I've gone ahead and committed it. If we start getting
> complaints about use-cases this doesn't cover, we can re-discuss whether
> it's worth doing more.
This looks fine to me. Thanks.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2015-07-03 00:15:04 | Interesting study "what is C in practice" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-02 23:07:45 | Re: bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext |