Re: pow support for pgbench

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: pow support for pgbench
Date: 2017-10-30 11:58:58
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRe_ULReqE-rt9yAoaCaWiCYZAkw1oLeTP0VJSE_2Ab_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Raúl Marín Rodríguez
<rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com> wrote:
> both patches seem complementary. I've rebased my changes on top of that
> patch
> (v14) in https://git.io/vFtnT and everything seems to be working fine.

Attaching patches directly to a thread is a better practice as if
github goes away, any Postgres developers can still have an access to
any code you publish using the public archives on postgresql.org.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message amul sul 2017-10-30 12:22:35 Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-10-30 11:57:50 Re: More stats about skipped vacuums