Re: pgrestore command

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgrestore command
Date: 2014-03-01 09:53:38
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRZwM5yC0GR=KCbA09eFG2WpgEojynJCxqnbBywzStjiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:23 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/28/2014 5:06 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> You could expect a loss of 20% at I/O level by using a virtualized
>> environment compared to a physical server with similar hardware (rule
>> of thumb, number more or less general by experience).
>
>
> and that could be 200% or more if there is IO and/or CPU contention from
> other virtual machines on the same physical host.
Definitely. Thanks for precising that as well.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vincent Veyron 2014-03-01 11:33:58 Re: Moving data from M$ JetDB file to Postgres on Linux
Previous Message Wim Bertels 2014-03-01 08:59:50 education: european project + optionally 1 non-european partner